Karlspreises, einem Freimaurer-Orden.
In "Praktischer Idealismus" beschreibt er seine Zukunftsversionen.
Zitat: Der Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling
sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden der zunehmenden Ueberwindung von Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse, Aeusserlich der altaegyptischen Aehnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Voelker durch eine Vielfalt der Persoenlichkeiten ersetzen. [...] Der Einfluss des Blutadels sinkt, der Einfluss des Geistesadels waechst. Diese Entwicklung, und damit das Chaos moderner Politik, wird erst dann ihr Ende finden, bis eine geistige Aristokratie die Machtmittel der Gesellschaft: Pulver, Gold und Druckerschwaerze an sich reisst und zum Segen der Allgemeinheit verwendet. Eine entscheidende Etappe zu diesem Ziel bildet der russische Bolschewismus, wo eine kleine Schar kommunistischer Geistesaristokraten das Land regiert und bewusst mit dem plutokratischen Demokratismus bricht, der heute die uebrige Welt beherrscht. Der Kampf zwischen Kapitalismus und Kommunismus um das Erbe des besiegten Blutadels ist ein Bruderkriege des siegreichen Hirnadels, ein Kampf zwischen individualistischem und sozialistischem, egoistischem und altruistischem, heidnischem und christlichem Geist. Der Generalstab beider Parteien rekrutiert sich aus der geistigen Fuehrerrasse Europas: dem Judentum.
Bei Anzeigefehler hier klicken: Illuminaten Hochburg Aachen
Freimaurer und Illuminaten wollen also als "Neuen Menschen", als perfekten Sklaven eine eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse. Um die "Konstruktion" eines "Neuen Menschen" geht es auch bei Frankensteins Monster.
Frankensteins Monster geht gemäß Dr. Rabbi Marvin Antelmann auf die satanischen, krypto-jüdischen Frankisten zurück. War Helmut Kohl ein Frankist?
Auf die satanischen, krypto-jüdischen Frankisten gehen gemäß Antelmann, Gersholm Scholem und anderen aber auch Freimaurer, Illuminaten, Kommunisten, Nazis, der Feminismus und die gesamte "moderne" Gesellschaft, die satanische Jugend-Gegenkultur zur klassischen deutschen Kultur u.v.m. zurück. Die Nazis wollten Übermenschen züchten, die krypto-jüdischen Kommunisten hingegen wollten Untermenschen, unter anderem durch Kreuzung von Menschen und Affen, als perfekte Sklaven, als Prolet-Arier, züchten. Dem entsprechend haben die krypto-jüdischen Kommunisten die Intelligenzija im eigenen Land abgeschlachtet.
Heute geht der Irrsinn der Züchtung perfekter Sklaven und Untertanen mit der Gentechnik, mit syntetischer Biologie weiter. Philosophisch und ideologisch wird der Irrsinn durch den sog. Transhumanismus vorbereitet.
Ursprung des Irrsinns ist die geisteskranke Ideologie der satanischen Kabbalisten nach der Gott bei der Schaffung der Welt ein Fehler unterlaufen sein soll. Die Hirnverbrannten glauben ernsthaft selbst Schöpfer, also Gott bzw. "Baumeister der Welten" spielen zu müssen um eine bessere Menschheit zu erschaffen. Dieser kranke Wahn ist der Ursprung aller Kriege und Revolutionen der letzten 300 Jahre.
Udo Ulfkotte Interview + Lesung Vorsicht Buergerkrieg. Seinen Journalisten-Posten bei der FAZ gab er auf, weil auch diese Presse ihm nicht gestattete, ueer fuer uns sehr wichtige Dinge frei zu berichten! Kuerzlich erschien Udo Ulfkottes neuestes Buch = "Vorsicht Buergerkrieg". Untertitel: "Was lange gaert - wird endlich Wut".
Das Interview gibt es auch hier. Sie auch hier!
May 30, 2003 issue of Executive Intelligence
Synarchsm: The Fascist Roots of the Wofowitz Cabal
by Jeffrey Stenberg
In 1922, Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergaunched the Pan European Union,founding conventonn Venna, attended by more than 6,000 delegates. Rang aganst the „Boshevst menace“n Russia, the Venetan Count caed for the duton of a the naton-states of Western Europe and the erectnge, European feudal state, modeed on the Roman and Napoeonc empres. „There are Europeans,“ Coudenhove-Kaerg warned, who are „naïve enough to beeve that the opposon between the SovUnon and Europe can be brdged by thencusion of the Sovet Union in the United States of Europe. These Europeans need ony to gance at the map to persuade themseves that the Sovet Union in its immensity can, with the hep of theCommunst Third Internationavery quicky prevail overtte Europe. To receive this Trojan horse into the European union wouead to perpetua war and the extermination of European cuture. Soong, therefore, as there is any wil to survive subsistng in Europe, the idea ofnking the SovUnion with Pan Europe must be reected. It woud be nothingess than the suicide of Europe.“ sewhere, Coudenhove-Kalerg echoed the contemporaneous wrngs of Brsh Fabian Roundtabe devotees H.G. Wes and Lord Bertrand Russe, decaring: „Ths eternacan end ony wth the constitution of a word repubc.... The ony wayeft to save the peace seems to be po of peacefu strength, the modethe Roman, that succeededn havng theongest period of peacen the west thanks to the supremacy of hegons.“ Theaunching the Pan European Union bankroed by the Venetan-rooted European bankng famly, the Warburgs. Max Warburg, scon of the German branch of the famly, gave Coudenhove-Kaergi 60,000 gold marks to hold the founding conventon. Even more reveang, the frst mass ray of the Pan European Union in Berin, at the Reichstag, was addressed by Hmar Schacht, later the Rechsbank head, Economcs Mnister and chief architect of the Hiter coup. A decadeater, in October 1932, Schacht devered a major address before another PanEuropa event,n whch he assured Coudenhove-Kalergand the others, „In three months, Htler wbe in power....er wil create PanEuropa. Ony Hiter can create PanEuropa.“
According to historical documents, Italy´s Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini was initially skeptical about the PanEuropa idea, but was „won over“ to the scheme, following a meeting with Coudenhove-Kalergi, during which, in the Count´s words, „I gave him a complete harvest of Nietzsche´s quotes for the United States of Europe.... My visit represented a shift in the behavior of Mussolini towards PanEuropa. His opposition disappeared.“ At the founding congress of the Pan European Union in Vienna, the backdrop behind the podium was adorned with portraits of the movement´s leading intellectual icons: Immanuel Kant, Napoleon Bonaparte, Giuseppe Mazzini, and Friedrich Nietzsche.
The pivotal role of Schacht in the Hitler coup and in the Pan European Union, highlights a critical dimension of the universal fascist scheme: the top-down role of the financial „overworld“ and its banking technocrats. By all historical accounts, Schacht was the architect, in 1930, of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), along with the Bank of England´s Montagu Norman. Historian Carroll Quigley, in his epic book, Tragedy and Hope—A History of the World in Our Time (New York: MacMillan Company, 1966), described the BIS scheme to establish a dictatorship over world finance: „The powers of financial capital had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world´s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.“ Quigley highlighted the role of Schacht´s closest ally in the BIS scheme, Bank of England Governor Norman, who headed the privately owned British institution for an unprecedented 24 years (1920-44). „Norman was a strange man,“ Quigley reported, „whose mental outlook was one of successfully suppressed hysteria or even paranoia. He had no use for governments and feared democracy. Both of these seemed to him to be threats to private banking, and thus to all that was proper and precious in human life. Strong-willed, tireless, and ruthless, he viewed his life as a kind of cloak-and-dagger struggle with the forces of unsound money which were in league with anarchy and Communism.“ Montagu Norman and Hjalmar Schacht personified the banking overworld, that bankrolled and installed Hitler and the Nazis in power, in pursuit of their larger, universal fascist scheme. Even more damning were the profiles of Schacht and Norman and their role in the Hitler project, in The Hitler Book, by a Schiller Institute research team, headed by Helga Zepp-LaRouche (New York: New Benjamin Franklin House, 1984):
„The BIS, nominally set up after the breakdown of ´normal´ international financial relations in order to prevent a downward spiralling of international payments, in fact finished off the hapless Weimar Republic by its stern refusal to come to the help of a virtually bankrupt Germany in the crucial summer of 1931, after the Danat Bank collapse had brought the whole nation to its knees. Schacht, who had been a member of the original BIS team and was to return to its board from 1933 through 1938, had been campaigning since his 1930 resignation as head of the Reichsbank, for Anglo-American support for a takeover by the NSDAP [Nazi Party] and its leader, Herr Hitler. He had resigned on March 7, 1930 and the BIS was formally established in June. In September, he was off to London and the United States, to ´sell´ the Nazi option to the Anglo-American leadership, notably Bank of England governor and BIS director Montagu Norman, and the already influential Dulles brothers of Sullivan & Cromwell law firm, one of America´s most influential—and the attorneys for IG Farben, and many other large German companies and provincial governments. Schacht´s Hamburg friend and colleague, patrician Nazi Gerhard Westrick, ran the correspondent law firm to Dulles´s in Germany.“ On March 16, 1933, a grateful Hitler brought Schacht back as head of the Reichsbank, explained The Hitler Book. A year later, Schacht was made Economics Minister. „Now, the BIS was going to help the Third Reich—by 1939 it had no less than several hundred million Swiss gold francs invested in Germany. On the BIS board were Baron Kurt von Schröder, by now a general in the SS Death´s Head Brigade; Dr. Hermann Schmitz of IG Farben—whom Schacht had trained at the imperial economics ministry from 1915 on—and, later, Hitler´s two personal appointees, Walter Funk and Emil Puhl of the Reichsbank.“
The larger universal fascist schema, into which the Norman-Schacht „Hitler project“ fit, was well known to leading American intelligence, military, and diplomatic figures of the Franklin Roosevelt era, who maintained exhaustive files under such headings as „Synarchist/Nazi-Communist.“ U.S. Government archives from the FDR era, which were made available to EIR researchers, feature extensive intelligence reports on the international fascist plots, from the files of the U.S. State Department; U.S. Army Intelligence and Navy Intelligence; and the Coordinator of Information (COI), and its successor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). These files are of immediate relevance today, given the ongoing coup d´état in Washington by the disciples of Leo Strauss, Alexandre Kojève, and Carl Schmitt inside the George W. Bush Administration. Kojève and Schmitt were leading figures in the wartime „Synarchist“ conspiracy, and they personified the perpetuation of that universal fascist plan and apparatus into the postwar period. Already, following EIR´s lead, major American and European newspapers have identified such putschists as Paul Wolfowitz, Abram Shulsky, William Kristol, John Ashcroft, Steve Cambone, and Gary Schmitt as the offspring of the late University of Chicago Prof. Leo Strauss; Strauss, in turn, was the life-long collaborator and promoter of Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt, official Nazi philosopher and Nietzsche revivalist Martin Heidegger, and French Synarchist Alexandre Kojève—all unabashed advocates of tyranny as the only appropriate form of government. Although the May 4 Sunday New York Times feature off-handedly mentions Kojève as Strauss´s colleague, without further identification, all of the major media coverage has been sanitized of any discussion of the overtly fascist/Synarchist roots of the Straussian creed.
Nevertheless, there are growing indications that some elements within the U.S. Political institutions—particularly the military and intelligence communities, which comprise an important element of what Lyndon LaRouche refers to as „the institution of the U.S. Presidency“—are waking up to the cruel reality that a small group of universal fascists has seized the reins of power and is steering an ill-equipped President George W. Bush, the United States, and the rest of the world into a maelstrom of perpetual war and chaos. A timely review of the history of the 20th-Century Synarchists is, therefore, in order, to enable those political circles already shocked into action, to understand the nature of the enemy, and exploit the greatest weakness of these Straussian would-be putschists—their open embrace of universal fascism, otherwise known as „Synarchism.“
The Langer Study
As EIR reported on May 9 (“Dick Cheney Has a French Connection—To Fascism“), in 1947, OSS veteran and Harvard Prof. William L. Langer assembled the official history of the Roosevelt Administration´s dealings with Vichy France. Our Vichy Gamble was based on an exhaustive review of wartime archives, buttressed by interviews with top American officials, including OSS head Gen. William Donovan and President Franklin Roosevelt himself. Langer minced no words in discussing the Synarchist circles in Vichy France. Referring to Adm. Jean François Darlan, who, along with Pierre Laval, was among the most notorious of the Vichy collaborationists with the Nazis, Langer wrote: „Darlan´s henchmen were not confined to the fleet. His policy of collaboration with Germany could count on more than enough eager supporters among French industrial and banking interests—in short, among those who even before the war, had turned to Nazi Germany and had looked to Hitler as the savior of Europe from Communism.... These people were as good fascists as any in Europe.... Many of them had long had extensive and intimate business relations with German interests and were still dreaming of a new system of ´synarchy,´ which meant government of Europe on fascist principles by an international brotherhood of financiers and industrialists.“ EIR is in possession of many of the documents that Langer reviewed, in preparing Our Vichy Gamble. They offer an in-depth study of a fascist apparatus, whose European-wide tentacles extended into France, Germany, Britain, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands—and, across the Atlantic, inside the United States. One particularly revealing document, prepared by the Coordinator of Information in November 1940, focussed on the Synarchist strategy towards England and America. The document was called, „Synarchie and the Policy of the Banque Worms Group.“ The unnamed author began, „In recent reports there have been several references to the growing political power of the Banque Worms group in France, which includes amongst its members such ardent collaborationists as Pucheu, Benoist-Mechin, Leroy-Ladurie, Bouthillier, and representatives of big French industrial organizations.“ Under the subtitle, „Similarity of aims of ´Synarchie´ and Banque Worms,“ the report continued, „The reactionary movement known as ´Synarchie´ has been in existence in France for nearly a century. Its aim has always been to carry out a bloodless revolution, inspired by the upper classes, aimed at producing a form of government by ´technicians,´ under which home and foreign policy would be subordinated to international economy. The aims of the Banque Worms group are the same as those of ´Synarchie,´ and the leaders of the two groups are, in most cases, identical.“
The „Banque Worms group“ was closely allied with the Lazard banking interests in Paris, London, and New York, and with Royal Dutch Shell´s Henri Deterding. Hippolyte Worms, the bank´s founder, was one of 12 initial Synarchist Movement of Empire (SME) members, according to other French police and intelligence reports. The report itemized the aims of the Synarchists, as of August 1940: „to check any new social schemes which might tend to weaken the power of the international financiers and industrialists; to work for the ultimate complete control of all industry by international finance and industry; to protect Jewish and Anglo-Saxon interests; ... to take advantage of Franco-German collaboration to conclude a series of agreements with German industries, thereby establishing a solid community of interests between French and German industrialists, which will tend to strengthen the hands of international finance and industry; ... to effect a fusion with Anglo-Saxon industry after the war.“ The author of the COI study reported, „There is reason to believe that both [Hermann] Göring and Dr. [Walther] Funk are in sympathy with these aspirations,“ and that „Some headway is claimed to have been made in securing the adhesion of big U.S. Industry to the movement.“
Beaverbrook and Hoare
The COI study´s segment regarding „Policy in regard to Great Britain,“ elaborated the following Synarchist plan: „To bring about the fall of the Churchill Government by creating the belief in the country that a more energetic government is needed to prosecute the war; it is recognized that an effective means of creating suspicion of the Government´s efficiency would be to induce the resignation of Lord Beaverbrook; to bring about the formation of a new Government including Sir Samuel Hoare, Lord Beaverbrook and Mr. Hore-Belisha. (Note. The source has added that in the Worms group it is believed that those circles in Great Britain who are favorably disposed to their plan, are most critical of Mr. Churchill, Lord Halifax and Captain Margesson.); through the medium of Sir Samuel Hoare to bring about an agreement between British industry and the Franco-German ´bloc´; to protect Anglo-Saxon interests on the continent; to reach an agreement for the cessation of the reciprocal bombing of industrial centers. (Note. The source has added that Göring is reputed to have signified his entire approval of this project.)“ The naming of Lord Beaverbrook and Sir Samuel Hoare, two leading figures in the British Roundtable group, as Synarchist collaborators is of great significance, indicating that American intelligence, from no later than 1940, was tracking the high-level British involvement in the scheme for a postwar universal fascist „Europe of the oligarchs,“ along precisely the lines spelled out in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi´s „Synarchist“ manifesto, founding the Pan European Union. Indeed, other U.S. Intelligence wartime documents identified the PEU as a project of the European Synarchist secret brotherhood. The Synarchist Movement of Empire (SME), according to various accounts in the wartime U.S. Files, was founded in 1917 or 1922, and the first two major „projects“ of the Synarchists were Mussolini´s March on Rome and the launching of the Pan Europa movement
Back on the British front: Sir Samuel Hoare was a leading figure in British intelligence, having been posted to Russia during the period of the Bolshevik Revolution, where he had a personal hand in the assassination of Grigori Rasputin, after Rasputin had warned that Russian participation in World War I would surely lead to the fall of the Romanovs. Hoare was the leading British military intelligence case-officer for instigating the overthrow of the Tsar and the Russian Revolution. He personified the upper echelons of what U.S. Intelligence files characterized as the „Synarchist/Nazi-Communist“ group. In his capacity as Foreign Secretary in 1935, he had negotiated the Hoare-Laval agreement, by which Great Britain and France mutually accepted Mussolini´s conquest by invasion of Abyssinia, a major act of appeasement. He later served as British ambassador to Francisco Franco´s Spain, and, according to several biographical accounts, remained secretly on Lord Beaverbrook´s payroll as a policy advisor. Hoare, later „Lord Templewood,“ was also a leading British promoter of Frank Buchman and the Moral Rearmament Movement, the antecedent to Rev. Sun Myung Moon´s Unification Church.
The case of Lord Beaverbrook (Max Aitken) has even more profound and enduring implications, given that two of the leading financial-political propagandists for today´s neo-conservative revolution in Washington—press magnates Lord Conrad Black and Rupert Murdoch—are Beaverbrook protégés. The Australian Murdoch, on graduating Oxford, did an apprenticeship at Beaverbrook´s London Daily Express, which Murdoch referred affectionately to as „Beaverbrook´s brothel.“ For Black, the connection ran deeper—through the wartime British secret intelligence high command. Conrad Black´s father, George Montagu Black, worked directly under the Beaverbrook chain of command during World War II, when Beaverbrook was Minister of Aircraft Production, and when Black and Edward Plunkett Taylor ran the Canadian front company War Supplies, Ltd. Out of the Willard Hotel in Washington, coordinating all British-American-Canadian military procurement arrangements. The $1.3 billion garnered by Taylor and Black from their wartime „private“ arms deals provided the seed money for G.M. Black´s postwar launching of the Argus Corp., which, today, is the Hollinger Corp. Media cartel of Conrad Black. Beaverbrook´s transformation, from a leading promoter of an Anglo-German alliance following Hitler´s takeover, to a leading war cabinet official, following Hitler´s attack on Britain, was nothing short of miraculous. In 1935, when Hoare had conducted the secret negotiations with Laval, Beaverbrook had accompanied the Foreign Secretary on the trip and conducted his own back-channel work to assure positive media coverage of the deal in both England and France. That year, Beaverbrook traveled to Rome and Berlin for personal meetings with Mussolini and Hitler. A year later, Beaverbrook was the guest of Hitler´s Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, at the Munich Olympic Games. But the most famous part that Beaverbrook played in the Hitler saga, had to do with the 1933 Reichstag fire—the arson attack on the Weimar Republic´s parliament—which consolidated Hitler´s death grip on absolute power. Beaverbrook had posted a trusted aide, Sefton Delmer, in charge of his Daily Express press bureau in Berlin, and Delmer had become a confidant of Hitler, traveling with him on the campaign trail during the 1933 elections. Delmer was one of the first „journalists“ to arrive as the Reichstag burned, and his dispatch from the scene—complete with exclusive interviews with Hitler, Göring, and others—established the cover for the actual Nazi authors of the terror attack, which sealed Hitler´s dictatorship. Delmer, in a 1939 article recounting the incident, stuck to his story, which countered the majority of the world media coverage, and blamed the fire on a communist—not on the Nazis.
Beaverbrook—even after his „Damascus road conversion“ to war cabinet minister—retained his ties to the Nazi machine. When Nazi leader Rudolph Hess parachuted into Scotland, in a final vain effort to maintain the Anglo-Nazi alliance against the Soviet Union, Beaverbrook arranged a private prison interview with Hess. Details of the session are still sketchy, but one quote to emerge from the meeting, was Hess telling Beaverbrook: „Hitler likes you a great deal.“ ´
Among the thousands of documents that EIR obtained from the U.S. Wartime archives was an 18-page French military intelligence report, summarizing a 100-page dossier on the French Synarchist groups, dated July 1941. The report dealt with the Synarchist Movement of Empire (SME), the Synarchist Revolutionary Convention (SRC) and the Secret Committee of Revolutionary Action (SCRA), the military leadership arm of the SME, also known as the „Cagoulards“ (the „hooded ones“). The report provided a brief history: The Synarchist movement is an international movement born after the Versailles Treaty, which was financed and directed by certain financial groups belonging to the top international banking community. Its aim is essentially to overthrow in every country, where they exist, the parliamentary regimes which are considered insufficiently devoted to the interests of these groups and therefore, too difficult to control because of the number of persons required to control them. SME proposes therefore to substitute them by authoritarian regimes more docile and more easily manueverable. Power would be concentrated in the hands of the CEOs of industry and in designated representatives of chosen banking groups for each country. In a word, the idea is to give to each country a political constitution and an appropriate national economic structure organized for the following purposes:
Place the political power directly into the hands of chosen people and eliminate all intermediaries.
Establish a maximum concentration of industries and suppress all unwarranted competition.
Establish an absolute control of prices of all goods (raw materials, semi-finished or finished goods).
Create judicial and social institutions that would prevent all extremes of action.
The dossier reported that, following failed Cagoulard insurrections in 1934 and 1937, the SME infiltrated all the economic and related ministries of the French government, conducted sabotage from within the regime, and set the basis for the Vichy government of 1940, which was dominated, from top to bottom, by Synarchist secret society members. The report named 40 top officials of the government of Marshal Henri Philippe Pétain, who were all SME members. The dossier repeatedly emphasized that the French SME was but one component of an international Synarchist apparatus, „organized and financed in all countries by certain elements of industrial CEOs and high banking circles.
Its objective on the international level is to subvert all of the democratic regimes in the world, and substitute them with stronger governments, more docile and whose leaders of command in each nation are centralized in the hands of a number of affiliates belonging to big business and international banking interests which coordinate their activities around the world.“ In France, under the Vichy regime, noted the dossier, „the main administrations of the country, have become the arms of Bank Worms whose administrative council controls all of the top administrators of the state.“
The Synarchists did not concentrate all their efforts on infiltrating and controlling the Vichy regime. A U.S. Military intelligence report, dated July 27, 1944, from the military attaché in Algiers, warned of Synarchist penetration of the upper echelons of the Free French government of Gen. Charles de Gaulle, headquartered in Algeria. „Some of the oldest and formerly most faithful supporters of General de Gaulle are worried by what they call a tendency to let ´Synarchism´ penetrate even the highest brackets of the Algiers Administration,“ the report began. „It is believed that General de Gaulle up to recently, opposed Synarchism, which is a strongly reactionary movement, financed by the Haute Banque.
He has even ordered a confidential study to be made on the subject, a copy of which has been seen by American officers.“ The report concluded,
„If it is a fact that many individuals who are holding positions of importance in the cabinet and the immediate entourage of General de Gaulle, are also closely associated with political ideas alien to the program which de Gaulle and his government publicly endorse, then far-reaching political inferences may be drawn.“
Of course, a decade later, leading wartime „Gaullist“ Jacques Soustelle would launch the Secret Army Organization (OAS), which would be responsible for repeated assassination attempts against de Gaulle, and would be implicated in the Permindex assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
While it is not certain that Soustelle was a wartime member of the Synarchist plot, it is certain, from French and American government records, that one leading Synarchist operative infiltrated into the de Gaulle Free French camp was Robert Marjolin, one of Alexandre Kojève´s prize student/protégés of his 1933-39 courses on Hegel, Nietzsche, and the „end of history.“
Marjolin became Minister of Economy in the first de Gaulle postwar government, and he immediately brought Kojève into the ministry.
The Cult of Napoleon
At its core, the Synarchist international—like its front group Pan European Union—sought to create a one-world tyranny, modeled on the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte. The first „Synarchist“ text was written in the 1860s by Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d´Alveydre (1842-1909), an occultist and follower of Napoleon Bonaparte´s own mystical advisor, Antoine Fabre d´Olivet (1767-1825).
Fabre d´Olivet had started out as a leading member of the Jacobins, participating personally in the foiled assassination plot against King Louis XVI in 1789. He later served as a top official of the Interior and War Ministries under Napoleon Bonaparte. His occult writings about „purgative violence“ and the „will to power“ —antecedents of the works of Nietzsche—were adopted by Saint-Yves d´Alveydre, who launched the idea of Synarchism as a counter to the anarchy that had destabilized all of Europe, from 1648. Saint-Yves´ successor, Gerard Vincent Encausse (“Papus“), founded the Saint-Yves School of Occult Sciences, and began a recruiting drive for a secret society, which he called the Synarchy Government. In his 1894 book Anarchie, Indolence & Synarchie, Papus spelled out an ambitious scheme to recruit all of the leaders of industry, commerce, finance, the military, and academia, to a single power scheme, aimed at destroying the „internal microbe“ of society, anarchy. Both Saint-Yves and Papus envisioned a global Synarchist empire, divided into five areas: